- PUBLICATION ETHICS
It is necessary that all parties participating in the process of publication for the journal Russkaya Rech’ (Russian Sheech), meaning authors, reviewers, members of the editorial team and publisher, agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior.
The publishing ethics and malpractice policies of the journal Russkaya Rech’ (Russian Sheech) follow the relevant COPE guidelines (ссылка: https://publicationethics.org/) and in case a malpractice is suspected, journal editors will act in accordance with them.
1. Authorship and transparency
By submitting a paper, the authors confirm their authorship of the submitted article. Those submitting papers should carefully check that all those whose work (in research or writing) contributed to the paper are acknowledged as contributing authors.
Funding for any type of publication should be stated within the publication.
Authors should ensure that they clearly cite, reference and acknowledge all instances where they have used or been influenced by the work of others, including their own previously published articles and research material. Any form of plagiarism, including self plagiarism (redundant publication) will not be tolerated.
2. First publication and copyright
Original research articles submitted to the Russkaya Rech’ (Russian Sheech) must not have been published as copyrighted material elsewhere. Manuscripts under consideration by the Russkaya Rech’ (Russian Sheech) should not be submitted for review elsewhere. If an article reproduces research material, tables, images, the author must seek permission to use that material and fully acknowledge the owner and/or copyright owner of that material.
By submitting a manuscript, the author agrees to accept the journal's copyright policy (see Copyright and License Statement.
3. Dishonesty and libel
Authors must use their best endeavours to ensure that the material they submit contains no fictitious data, reference omissions, or false statements. When the authors discover a significant error or inaccuracy in their own published work, it is the authors' obligation to promptly notify the journal editor and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Authors should avoid the use of personal, critical, or disparaging remarks and accusations against fellow researchers, colleagues or other individuals.
Reviewers should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Reviewers should have no conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors and/or the research founders.
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
5. Editors' responsibilities
Editors have sole responsibility for acceptance or rejection of a manuscript. Manuscripts should have peer review, but the editors may reject or accept for cause (inappropriate for journal, clearly of poor quality, contents previously published elsewhere, etc.).
Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed.
Editors should have no conflict of interest with respect to articles they reject or accept.
Editors should preserve anonymity of reviewers.
Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
- PEER REVIEW POLICY AND PROCEDURE
The choice of reviewers lies within the competence of the members of the journal's advisory board. Every submitted article is evaluated by at least two members of the journal's advisory board or external experts with relevant experience and expertise.
On receiving the reviews the advisory board may decide that additional reviewing is necessary for an appropriate evaluation of the submitted article. When the required number of reviews is received, the editors consider the experts’ opinions and make a decision to accept, reject, or request a substantial revision.
The reviewing may take up to six months. The editors’ response with their decision, full texts of the reviews, and a list of any changes needed for the article to be accepted for publication is then sent to the author.
If the decision is for substantial revision, the author must respond to the comments made by the reviewers and/or Editor, and resubmit as soon as he can. Usually the revised manuscript will be re-evaluated by the original reviewers.
The editorial board and the editorial office preserve the anonymity of reviewers and don’t inform authors of the reviewers’ names (single blind peer review).
Upon receiving a negative response from the advisory board the author can submit it to any other publisher.
- SUBMISSION PROCEDURE
1. Russkaya Rech’ (Russian Sheech) accepts papers written in Russian language, corresponding to the scientific profile of the journal, and which have not been previously published and are not under consideration by another journal.
2. Papers are chosen to be published on the basis of peer-reviewing and on the decision of the advisory board of the journal. The full texts of the reviews are forwarded to the authors along with the response of the advisory board.
3. All publications are fee-free for the authors.
4. Full text of the journal’s issues is published on the official website of the journal.
5. Before submitting a manuscript authors are required to check off their submission’s compliance with the formatting requirements outlined in the General Manuscript Style Guide. After that it can be sent to the editors’ e-mail address email@example.com. If a non-standard font was used in the manuscript, please attach the font file to your message.
6. The covering letter should include the following information about the author: name, affiliation, country and city, phone number, electronic address. Full mailing address is not needed because offprints of published papers are not sent to the authors. The author will receive his copy electronically (in PDF format) by e-mail.
7. Reviews should be submitted along with a copy of the reviewed edition. At the request of the author of the review, the book will be afterwards returned to him.
- ARTICLE SUBMISSION RULES
When formatting the bibliography list please follow the pattern used in recent issues of the journal (2019-2020).
The general rules of presenting a scientific article