The Names for Banana in the Russian Language of the 18th c.


2026. № 5, 29-42

Kira I. Kovalenko1, Valeria B. Kolosova2

European University at St. Petersburg; Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences (Russia, St. Petersburg)

kira.kovalenko@gmail.com1, chakra@eu.spb.ru2

Abstract:

This article examines a number of names for the banana plant (Musa spp.) and its fruits in the 18th-century Russian. It traces the emergence and use of the following phytonyms: muza, musa, muza mudryh, muza bananskaya, banan, banana, bananas, bananiyan, bananiera, bala, indijskaya figa, indijskaya smokva, indejskaya smokovnica (Indian fig), indejskij banannik, Adamova smokovnica (Adam's fig), Adamovo yabloko (Adam's apple), rajskoe yabloko (apple of Paradise), rajskaya figa, rajskaya smokva (apple of paradise), pizans, pizang, plantan, planten, plantejn, plantin, plantins and figyuejra. The diversity of nominations is due to the fact that the Russian language used lexemes from Western European languages, which, in turn, were borrowed from the local languages of the territories where the banana plant was grown. Some of the names are motivated by the idea of the banana as a tree that grew in paradise. Various approaches to rendering foreign-language plant names — transliteration, transcription, calques, word-formation, and morphological adaptation — also contributed to the emergence of variants.

Lexemes denoting banana names are recorded primarily in translated literature of various genres (fiction, scientific treatises, travelogues, and encyclopedias). These plant names are much less common in the works of Russian-language authors (newspaper publications, travelogues, memoirs and botanical, encyclopedic, or explanatory dictionaries), which are often compilations of foreign-language sources.

For citation:

Kovalenko K. I., Kolosova V. B. The Names for Banana in the Russian Language of the 18th c. Russian Speech = Russkaya Rech’. 2026. No. 5. Pp. 29–42. DOI: 10.7868/S3034592826050031

Acknowledgements:

The research was carried out within the framework of the project “Plants and people in the Russian Empire of the 18th century: knowledge and practice distribution among social classes”, implemented at the European University at St Petersburg. The authors would like to express their gratitude to O. S. Belichenko, Yu. M. Gizatullina, and G. A. Molkova for their assistance in finding sources and verifying quotes.